![]() ![]() The above answer is very biased, if not slander. It has no effect whatsoever,and is utterly meaningless.' (Quite often, it's paired with some sort of ridiculousultimatum if the recipient continues to pester you - 'any furthercorrespondence will be treated as acceptance of these terms andcharged at five million pounds/dollars' or similar). The (incorrect) idea is that by putting this phrase at the topof your document, you have unlocked a secret loophole, and you arenow providing all the necessary notice to all interested parties,and also effectively preventing them from ever being able to botheryou again, since you've already pre-emptively answered all theirquestions. ![]() Not coincidentally, it'sonly ever found in connection with 'sovereign citizen' or 'freemanon the land' cases, almost always where someone is trying to getout of paying a debt, to avoid taxes or to withdraw from the courtsystem. It's an official-sounding piece ofgibberish with no actual legal standing at all.ฤก00% of the time, it's used by people copying template documentsfrom other people on the Web (no actual notice drafted by anyactual lawyer will ever use this phrase). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |